The trial of Lindsay Clancy, a 36-year-old former nurse accused of murdering her three small children in Massachusetts, has captivated the nation for five weeks. The case hinges on whether Clancy's mental state at the time of the killings was sufficient to excuse her actions.

Clancy's defense team argues that she suffered from postpartum psychosis, a severe mental illness that can cause hallucinations and impaired judgment. Her lawyer, Elyse Hershon, claims that Clancy was unable to distinguish right from wrong due to her condition, making her criminally responsible for the murders.

Read More: US Supreme Court clears way for Trump to keep building White

However, the prosecution disputes this, arguing that Clancy made a calculated and intentional decision to kill her children.

The jury of nine women and three men will continue their deliberations on Tuesday morning, weighing several options before them. A not guilty verdict would likely be considered highly unlikely, with many experts predicting a guilty verdict for first-degree murder. This outcome carries a mandatory life sentence without parole in Massachusetts.

If the jury finds Clancy guilty of first-degree murder, they must also consider whether her mental illness was a mitigating factor. In this case, mental disease or defect could potentially reduce the sentence. Alternatively, the jurors may choose to convict Clancy of second-degree murder, which carries a life sentence with the possibility of parole.

Also Read: Japan Inc is betting big on India as China risks deepen

Another option on the table is manslaughter, which would mean Clancy unintentionally killed her children through an involuntary intoxication. This verdict requires less proof than first-degree or second-degree murder, as intent is not a necessary element. Experts say that this option allows the jury to accept that the murders were not premeditated but rather a split-second decision.

The outcome of the trial will determine where Clancy will serve the rest of her life. Her defense team hopes for a psychiatric facility, while the prosecution advocates for a state prison sentence. As one expert noted, if the jury finds Clancy guilty of first-degree murder, she would be seen as "a monster in their eyes."