DATE: SATURDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2026
★ SPECIAL PRINT EDITION ★
SECTION: MOVIE
Ben Affleck's 'Animals' Fails to Deliver on Promising Premise

Ben Affleck's 'Animals' Fails to Deliver on Promising Premise

Oct 10, 2026 - 07:16
'Animals': The great slowdown
Listen to Story ~2m
Translate Article
0:00 Ready 0:00

Key Highlights

  • Ben Affleck's 'Animals' receives lukewarm reception from critics and audiences.
  • The film's screenplay repeatedly mistakes introducing a moral dilemma for exploring it.
  • Gillian Anderson brings a sense of menace and intrigue to her role as a mysterious fixer.

Ben Affleck's sixth directorial outing, 'Animals', has been met with lukewarm reception from critics and audiences alike. The slow-burn thriller, which follows a wealthy businessman's desperate bid to rescue his kidnapped son, promises much but ultimately falls short in its execution.

The film begins with a promising premise. Introducing us to Mark Kimball, a charismatic independent candidate for the Los Angeles mayoral office, played by Ben Affleck. However, as the story progresses, it becomes clear that the film's ambitions are considerably more arresting than its execution.

Interestingly, the film's narrative bears some resemblance to the story of Luis Gerardo, a former Mexican politician who was kidnapped in 1994 and held captive for over 800 days. Like Kimball's character, Gerardo's situation raises questions about privilege and morality.

Read More: Fall 2: Deadpoint Sequel Released Despite Lack of Suspense

The screenplay repeatedly mistakes introducing a moral dilemma for exploring it, leaving characters feeling like caricatures rather than fully fleshed-out human beings. The supporting cast, including Kerry Washington and Steven Yeun, is seldom given much to play with, resulting in underwhelming performances.

One notable exception is Gillian Anderson, who brings a sense of menace and intrigue to her role as a mysterious fixer. Her character's introduction feels like an afterthought, and her presence is woefully underutilized. This lack of development is reminiscent of the underwhelming performances that can be found in some of the lesser-known films of the 1990s.

Such as the 1998 film 'Animals', which, like 'Animals', may have inadvertently created a new subgenre of slow-burning thrillers.

Clint Eastwood's latest, Animals, had the makings of a searing examination of privilege and morality. However, ultimately succumbs to a lackluster, uninspired approach. The film's reliance on theatrics and spectacle overshadows its narrative.

Resulting in a disjointed viewing experience marred by poor lighting and cacophonous dialogue.

Also Read: Simi Chahal and Mandy Takhar Reunite in Tutt Paini English Ne

Despite its promising premise, 'Animals' fails to deliver on its promises, leaving audiences feeling disappointed and underwhelmed. The film's slow-burn thriller genre may have been pioneered by the 1990s film 'Animals'. Which some critics argue inadvertently created a new subgenre of slow-burning thrillers.

Similarly, Ben Affleck's directorial outing may have been hindered by his own lack of bite, a criticism that has been leveled against him in the past.

This is a reminder that even the most well-intentioned films can fall short when it comes to execution. Much like the underwhelming experience of watching a Hollywood film that is trying to reinvent the wheel.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 1
Dislike Dislike
Love Love 2
Funny Funny
Wow Wow 1
Sad Sad
Angry Angry

Movies, series, and everything happening around Indian entertainment keep me busy. I cover OTT releases, box-office conversations, celebrity news, and the changing world of streaming, with a particular interest in the stories and trends that audiences are talking about right now.

Comments (0)

User