How Drone Swarm Tactics Are Becoming The New Norm For U.S. Soldiers

The U.S. Army has established a new standard in robotic combat, with soldiers now proficiently controlling up to 21 small drones and four large autonomous vehicles simultaneously. Recent exercises at Fort Bragg's Sandhills Project demonstrated this "swarm warfare" capability, designed to overwhelm enemies and shift engagements towards robot-on-robot combat.

Troops utilized Bumblebee V2 drones and a semi-autonomous Ford F-250 equipped with a 12-gauge shotgun turret for safe anti-drone defense. This force multiplication strategy, accelerated The Army confirms swarm tactics are no longer future concepts but the present reality, ushering in an era of machine-centric battles. The U.S.

For related coverage, explore our detailed analysis on Technology and Digital Systems.

Core Findings and Detailed Timeline

Army disclosed after a landmark drone swarm exercise held at Fort Bragg, North Carolina that individual soldiers are now proficient enough at flying drones that each operator can control up to 21 small unmanned aircraft systems and four large autonomous vehicles at once. The exercise, the latest iteration of the Army’s Sandhills Project, tested soldiers’ abilities to control drones and unmanned ground vehicles, or UGVs, plus use UGVs to defeat drone swarms.

Army engineers informed Forbes that the tests marked a major step forward in pushing modern combat methods into all-out battles between robots rather than humans. “We do one-to-21 so we can overwhelm the enemy. If warfare is about problem-solving, we want to be able to solve problems and create so many dilemmas for the enemy that they cannot respond,” Col.

Jeff Burges, commander of the U.S. Army’s 20th Engineering Brigade, shared in an exclusive interview.

“If one soldier can present more dilemmas to the enemy – if we can swarm them with 21 drones at a time – they can’t react to that.” Army engineers tested troops’ abilities to control Bumblebee V2 unmanned aircraft systems, deployed from a “hive" payload, across vast open areas.

Broader Implications and Future Outlook

They also used a UGV to practice killing drones flying in a swarm. The vehicle was a semi-autonomous Ford F-250 truck equipped with Forterra’s AutoDrive kit and a turret designed to track and shoot down drones. The 9 Mothers turret, manufactured While a shotgun fires at a slower rate, Army leaders chose this firearm to avoid risks to troops.

“We specifically chose the shotgun and not a machine gun because machine guns present problems,” Sgt. Corey Wilkens, the Army’s project manager for the exercise, informed Forbes. “Machine gun rounds go a long way.

This was a very conscious choice to pick a shotgun because I can have 360-degree firing without having to worry about rounds flying back towards friendly forces and shrinking directions in which I can fire.” The exercise demonstrated that the equipment not only functioned as intended, but that U.S. soldiers have reached new benchmarks in robotic combat techniques.

A key element of the Army’s recent progress has been the extent to which the service has facilitated direct contact between soldiers and private industry at test ranges and exercises. This has significantly sped up the process of improving and acquiring new technology, according to Col. Thomas Monaghan, commander of the Lt.

Read More: As Health Insurers Gain Handle On Costs, Stocks Are Soaring Again

James M. Gavin Joint Innovation Outpost for the Army’s XVIII Airborne Corps. “One really big key factor here is, for the first time ever, you’ve got soldiers who are coming up with problem sets and being able to solve or address them at the tactical edge with the help of acquisition and industry professionals,” he said in an interview.

“This is the first time the Army has partnered an acquisition cell with an operational unit, the XVIII Airborne Corps. So, through us, with us they can put those companies on contract and push that information back to other portfolio acquisition executives.” “It’s really helping to enable solving problems at the tactical edge for the warfighter in record time," he said.

While the early years of the war between Russia and Ukraine placed demands on U.S. forces to learn lessons from Ukrainian drone operators, U.S. soldiers are now efficient enough at wielding unmanned systems that the concept of a single operator using a single drone for a mission now belongs to a past era.

Army authorities say that swarming is the new standard expectation for soldiers – not only in terms of wielding unmanned aircraft systems but also autonomous systems on the ground. “The real point of having robotics is to have a force multiplying capability.

We see a lot of one-to-one [drone to operator scenarios] in combat between Russia and Ukraine right now, but we know the next evolution – not fighting the last war, but the next war – is that you need robotics be a force multiplier," said Wilkens.

"We can’t have all of our soldiers operating single UAS [unmanned aircraft systems].” Soldiers can now efficiently operate over two dozen Bumblebee V2 drones each and send them to perform different missions, including intelligence and reconnaissance, plus lock them on targets for one-way explosive attacks. The Army has also rapidly expanded its use of autonomous ground vehicles.

The semi-autonomous Ford F-250 truck can perform a variety of tasks for Army engineers, releasing “hives” of drones in remote areas, detecting mines, and breaching through obstacles. “You end up with a very, very powerful engineer platoon that can punch a lot heavier than the amount of people that are in it because you’re able to bring mass robotics to bear in the fight," Wilkens said.

“Theoretically, a single soldier could breach in four different places, with each vehicle doing a hundred-meter breach.” Robotic vehicles are also highly conducive to deception operations, he noted. “A key component of fighting with mass robotics is that we can carry out a very elaborate deception operation only using robotics and with next to no risk to human force,” he explained.

“Carrying out multiple operations across a wide front makes it very hard for the enemy to understand where we actually intend to fight," he said. Although popular concepts of drone warfare envision small unmanned aircraft systems attacking isolated targets, those tactics are now outdated.

troops are ready for future conflicts in which individual soldiers can launch large swarms of unmanned systems through the air and across the ground to attack enemy forces and fortifications.